Hi all, This issue arose recently as we were editing the forthcoming chapter on project and community governance, so I'm pleased to see the discussion taking place here and on GitHub. The Open Organization community tends toward the "review questions" route, but that's largely because we also release books in print and know that others use them for study and book club sessions. The questions, we're told, are good fodder for sparking broader conversations. If that is a vision and/or goal for this guidebook, then I would suggest that approach. Otherwise, I tend to like the "summary of themes" approach. We ask each author to condense three to five core ideas from the chapter and write them in one or two sentences (max), then collect those in a concluding section called something like "Chapter Review." This is also a great resource for reproducing elsewhere (on a home page, when someone asks "What's this chapter about, anyway?" etc.) BB